Who can reap the benefits of Video and SOCIAL MEDIA? Internet marketers, business owners, bands, auto sellers, realtors, bloggers, charities, plastic surgeons, consultants, and churches. In fact practically any online or offline organization with the ability to make short promotional videos can put their marketing efforts on steroids. The huge benefits can be amazing. Not only will a rise is seen by you in traffic, but also an increased position in the search engines, and lots of “anchor text” backlinks. The main advantage is the increased trust and kudos you shall share with your online profile.
The media content you will need to create can include video, audio, text and images. As a starting point I would recommend blogs and videos. Well video content will generate a relationship with customers much more readily than traditional text or sound based content alone. 1 The writing video sites such as YouTube, MySpacetv, Google video etc. – a few of the most highly trafficked sites in the world.
2 The major SE’s – Google and Yahoo! They have both followed a “universal” method of search rankings, that is to add not only the original text centered results but also higher rankings directed at photos and sound. The best rankings are generally directed at video content. You need to attract their attention with interesting and creative content, or helpful posts on the forums in your niche. You’ll need to start or interact conversations by commenting on expert blogs.
- Sachiko Ever After
- Choose Start -> Programs -> Accessories
- For Variable Name, enter: devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices
- Add photos, videos, responses, more
- Include a Visual With Every Post
- Animation Videos – $10 to $5000
The other major smartphone systems (iOS and Android) will have captive hardware arms. RIM has both hardware and Operating-system Even, although it’s been a while since RIM happened up as a model for others to emulate. Will Microsoft feel open without its hardware business? And if it does feel exposed, does it buy Nokia? I’d be very surprised if it does. Buying Nokia would end the Windows Mobile licensing business decisively.
You’d be gambling Microsoft’s mobile future even more completely on the ability of Nokia to perform in hardware. Besides, why buy the cow if you are already milking it? I’d also prefer to think that Microsoft discovered from the Zone debacle that it’s not great at creating mobile hardware. Exactly what will Apple do?
Apple’s background since Steve came back is that it doesn’t react to rivals; it forces rivals to react to it. Apple is excellent at placing the terms of your competition so other companies are compelled to compete on Apple’s turf. Everybody else is focused on building licensed item hardware, so Apple creates integrated systems.